Page 102 of 106 FirstFirst ... 25292100101102103104 ... LastLast
Results 1,011 to 1,020 of 1058

Thread: Fatshark beta 1g3 nexwave Rx Testing

  1. #1011
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    74
    Hi

    Yes, Fatshark support confirmed that "on" is towards the SMA connector and the label on the switch.

    Cheers

    Quote Originally Posted by hydev View Post
    Did you ever get a response to this? I have just brought this VTX and would like to get the frequency correct.


    Mike

  2. #1012
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    @John Hendry
    yes, it is the version with ch910. I have not tested that, only flying 1258...
    I also got the 4channel. The V4 with upgraded SAW. Both of them are very similar in performance...at least to my own at the field testing
    Last edited by rolf hult; 10th June 2016 at 03:14 AM.

  3. #1013
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by rolf hult View Post
    @John Hendry
    yes, it is the version with ch910. I have not tested that, only flying 1258...
    I also got the 4channel. The V4 with upgraded SAW. Both of them are very similar in performance...at least to my own at the field testing
    I stopped using my FS goggles receiver in favor of a ground station using the older (4 channel) rmrc receiver to improve the video link quality. Both receivers were using exactly the same antenna and the rmrc receiver was definitely better.

    Steve

  4. #1014
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    Quote Originally Posted by evans036 View Post
    I stopped using my FS goggles receiver in favor of a ground station using the older (4 channel) rmrc receiver to improve the video link quality. Both receivers were using exactly the same antenna and the rmrc receiver was definitely better.

    Steve
    Indeed, just what I found too...Lazerbgc v2, FS v2 anf FS 8ch...all allot worse in quality compared to an standalone rmrc/comtech.

  5. #1015
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    4,936
    Yes but what tx were you using? If you were using a shenzhen clairvoyance / "digital" type transmitter in conjunction with a nexwave/airwave/laser goggle module receiver, you are essentially mixing brands which can cause problems, so saying the rmrc receiver is "better" in this case isn't really a valid statement. To my knowledge all the goggle modules currently available use airwave/nexwave type RF modules. To get full compatibility with the shenzhen type transmitter you would need a goggle receiver made from a shenzhen or comtech type module, which is too big to fit in the goggles.
    Last edited by SecretSpy711; 13th June 2016 at 09:49 PM.
    youtube.com/secretspy711
    [COLOR="#ff8c00"][B][COLOR="#696969"]CO[/COLOR]FPV[COLOR="#4169e1"].com[/COLOR][/B] [/COLOR]

  6. #1016
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    Tested with FS 250mW, rmrc 800mW and rmrc 400mW.

  7. #1017
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by SecretSpy711 View Post
    Yes but what tx were you using? If you were using a shenzhen clairvoyance / "digital" type transmitter in conjunction with a nexwave/airwave/laser goggle module receiver, you are essentially mixing brands which can cause problems, so saying the rmrc receiver is "better" in this case isn't really a valid statement. To my knowledge all the goggle modules currently available use airwave/nexwave type RF modules. To get full compatibility with the shenzhen type transmitter you would need a goggle receiver made from a shenzhen or comtech type module, which is too big to fit in the goggles.
    My vtx is a 400mw Bevrc

    Steve

  8. #1018
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Norway, West coast
    Posts
    1,737
    Is the sma connector on the fatshark 250mw video transmitter strong enough to safely carry a cp antenna?

  9. #1019
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    830
    yes i use it on a 250 size quad and works great

  10. #1020
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    176
    Damn it! I've just found this thread and realised than the module I've ordered a week ago is 4ch version.
    Hey, mighty FatShark guys, will I get a replacement? =)
    Sent from my toaster :p

Similar Threads

  1. Nexwave Beta Bands RX range issue
    By Giulio in forum Fat Shark R/C Vision Systems
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 14th May 2015, 05:09 PM
  2. Nexwave Beta module not compatible with Dominator V1 ?
    By SecretSpy711 in forum Fat Shark R/C Vision Systems
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 9th November 2014, 11:41 AM
  3. NexWave Beta Module 5.8 frequencies not compatible with Immersion Vtx
    By Beachflyer in forum Fat Shark R/C Vision Systems
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 4th November 2014, 06:42 AM
  4. Nexwave 5.8 Beta, rp-sma or sma?
    By Jeff Troiano in forum Fat Shark R/C Vision Systems
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 19th September 2014, 03:04 AM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 3rd August 2014, 04:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •